Are you too lazy to look it up yourself?

Equally all-American is Wu’s idea that the U.S. should have open immigration with no national origin restrictions. No country in Asia allows it. In Alien Nation, Peter Brimelow reported the responses of the Chinese, Taiwanese, Indian, and Filipino embassies, when asked if an American could immigrate to their country:

China: “China does not accept any immigrants. We have a large enough population.”

Taiwan: You need Taiwanese relatives by blood or marriage.

India: “Are you of Indian origin?”

By Indian origin, the Indians mean Indian descent - an outright racial classification.

Every country in Asia has policies like that. If America were to adopt Asian-style immigration policies, perhaps as a result of the influence of Asian-American public intellectuals, I don’t think the Americanized Professor Wu would appreciate it.

http://www.vdare.com/fulford/wu.htm

In recognition, the government is thinking of loosening its restrictive immigration policy.

But any changes may come as a shock to a nation where registered foreigners make up just over 1% of its population.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wor.....708098.stm

“Registered foreigners” means workers.

Traditional Japan’s immigration policy was not willing to allow permanent residence for
resident aliens. In the case of a spouse or child of Japanese or a permanent resident, a 3-
year residential term was required. Otherwise, a 20-year continuous residential term was
necessary to be allowed a permanent residence permit.

c) Citizenship
It is reported that more than 330,000 individuals were naturalized in Japan from 1945 to
2000. Most of them are Koreans and Chinese as shown in table 4.

http://www.ip.kyusan-u.ac.jp/J.....0Japan.pdf

This isn’t brain surgery NOR a secret in anyway for you to want to give it the “fine tooth comb” treatment.

Please will you provide source links for your claims on India, China and Japan. Thanks.

I was only responding to the above. I think we’ve dealt with the “black” issue and was not re-opening anything.

In my colourful background, there was no “sneaking in”. Appropriate paperwork was filled in. Proper channels were taken. Heads were put down and worth was proved.

Very funny. LOL I like that.

Your main problem seems to be that you don’t like non-european immigration?

Well, that is the crux of the problem, isn’t it? Europe IS for Europeans. We no longer are in times of nomadic tribes that wander the countrysides and settle areas. We have nations with boundaries, laws, rules, and citizenry with culture that is ancient. Europe is not an “immigrant” continent.

Two reasons for the above:

1) We are seeing the incompatibility of distant immigrants, both culturally and genetically, and their effects on Europe. We do not need to beat this dead horse any longer. Some things may work, others do not. And with the case of distant immigration, as a whole, it does NOT.

2) As I’ve repeatedly stated, all other countries that send off wave upon wave of unwanted immigrants do NOT reciprocate in taking anyone “foreign” in. And it does not have to do with financial reasons, it has to do with genetic reasons as places like India, China, Japan, and Israel all want ONLY their respective people in their countries. This double standard alone is enough to halt immigration and repatriate most of them. Whites and Europe are somehow obliged to take in everyone from the planet. This makes absolutely no sense.

He once said, “White folks was in caves while we was building empires. We taught philosophy and astrology and mathematics before Socrates and them Greek homos ever got around to it”

Of course, I’m sure that Ethni would dispute this. Does the Reverend have any basis in fact though? What’s your thought Diva?

In my colourful background, there was no “sneaking in”. Appropriate paperwork was filled in. Proper channels were taken. Heads were put down and worth was proved. Your main problem seems to be that you don’t like non-european immigration? I can’t help you with that. As Europe expands and other “close cousins” and neighbours are joining or have joined I assume you will not have a problem with them emmigrating? Or do you have other limits to your opinion on who is “worthy” to join your club? Skin colour? Eating habits? Height?

intergration doesnt mean auto citizenship you know….

the “filipena”….

Should read…

we are close cousins and NOT total strangers

Diva, in the case I was sent back to Greece, did Jamaica make it into the EU while I was sleeping or something? I do recall stating with significant intermixing as one of my prerequisites in staying. If there has been that in your family tree, then why do you refer to yourself as “black” then? I’m sure you will have a reply to this as well.

To the “Filipena”, who states that one becomes automatically a Greek and citizen after 3 generations, I direct her to precedents set by her Asian cousins, both East and South, Arab nations, Israel, and many African nations where it does not matter how many generations a people resided there, they would never be “citizens”. My only wish is for Europeans to follow the excellent examples already set by her Asian kin. That shouldn’t be a problem, should it?

There is no viable commonality nor comparison between the immigrant waves of the past into places like the US, Australia, Canada, and some parts of Europe. Those waves were invited and were required to settle and/or populate the places in question, or helped in the productivity of the host European countries due to shortage of labour. That is one difference.

The second is that these European(Greek) immigrants of the past did so after going through appropriate channels and paperwork. None of them snuck in and disregarded the hosts to their and the host’s detriment.

A third difference is that the European immigrants, even though discriminated against by many Anglo derived host countries, did not cry, moan, wail, seek legal recourse, mewl of discrimination, or march in protest. What they DID do is learn the language (usually English) and assimilate into their host countries. They put their heads down and worked even harder to prove their worth, which they did clearly. Most became successful and their children even more so.

Lastly, the European immigrants of the past still WERE European, that is of similar genetic and cultural stock. With this, they had much commonality with their hosts. The hosts did not have to create some monstrosity named PC or hate laws in order to appease the immigrants because both, the host and immigrants were very similar. That is why the immigrant waves of the past melted into a unified America, Canada, and Australia. Many Greeks feel at home calling themselves British and German as well. The reason is that we are close cousins and total strangers. A very important distinction. Not so at all with our new, unwanted, unneeded, non-assimilating, genetically distant “saviours”.

Very simple to understand really, especially after shedding the shackles of PC and white Euro guilt that has been heaped around our collective necks over the last 40-50 years.

Posted by: Ethnocentrist | Sunday, November 27, 2005 at 18:34

Their host countries welcomed their papoudes and yayades with open arms and the younger generation intergrate into the american, canadian, australian and british society with a strong greekness identity at their own homes.

Most of my friends are already of the 3rd generations and cannot be called immigrants BUT CITIZENS.

A blog is a personal opinion I believed if you do not like the content, move on .. skip over!